Home / Blog /

Accelerating Real-Time Simulation with FPGA Workbench

As simulation models grow more complex and real-time systems demand faster responses, software-only solutions can begin to fall behind. High-resolution control loops, sensor emulation, and signal generation can all push CPU limits, especially when precise timing is essential.

FPGA Workbench is designed to solve this problem by introducing hardware acceleration into the simulation loop. It enables developers to build and deploy custom logic to FPGAs that operate alongside the RedHawk Linux environment. This setup offloads time-critical or repetitive tasks to dedicated hardware, increasing performance and maintaining deterministic execution.

Whether you’re developing a real-time test bench, signal processing platform, or high-speed simulation environment, FPGA Workbench gives you the tools to build reliable, hardware-accelerated systems without writing everything from scratch.

Why Use FPGAs in Simulation?

FPGAs (Field-Programmable Gate Arrays) are reconfigurable chips that execute custom logic with minimal latency. Unlike CPUs, which execute instructions sequentially, FPGAs can process signals in parallel with nanosecond-level timing precision.

They are particularly useful for tasks such as:

FPGA Workbench provides an abstraction layer that connects FPGA modules with the RedHawk Linux system and the rest of the simulation toolchain, such as SIMulation Workbench or NightStar.

Why Real-Time Debugging Requires a Specialized Approach

Conventional debuggers like gdb are powerful, but they introduce substantial runtime overhead and require developers to pause execution to inspect behavior. For real-time systems where latency and response windows are tightly constrained, that’s a non-starter.

NightStar approaches the problem differently. Its tools are built to observe, modify, and analyze applications without stopping them, providing a window into how a system behaves under live conditions.

This is especially valuable in applications running across multiple cores or involving interdependent processes. NightStar handles all of this complexity without sacrificing performance or visibility.

Integrated Development Workflow

FPGA Workbench includes everything needed to design, build, deploy, and manage FPGA-based components within a real-time application. The workflow typically includes:

This integration helps developers avoid the common pitfalls of co-processing, where mismatched timing or unclear communication paths introduce instability.

Supported Platforms and Connectivity

FPGA Workbench is compatible with a range of FPGA development boards and expansion modules. It supports communication via:

It works best when paired with Concurrent Real-Time’s iHawk platforms, which provide high-speed I/O backplanes and low-latency pathways between the CPU and FPGA. This ensures that FPGA data is processed quickly and predictably, without bottlenecks.

Bridging Software and Hardware

One of the biggest challenges in hardware-accelerated simulation is bridging the gap between low-level hardware and high-level application logic. FPGA Workbench addresses this by allowing real-time Linux applications to treat FPGA signals like standard variables.

For example:

This tight coupling allows hardware and software to evolve together, rather than being developed in isolation.

Use Cases

FPGA Workbench is used in systems that require ultra-low-latency performance, signal fidelity, or protocol-level emulation. Typical use cases include:

In each case, FPGA Workbench helps deliver accurate, stable results with the kind of speed that CPUs alone cannot provide.

Related Articles

  • Diagram showing software staying the same while hardware changes: Guest OS + Application on RedHawk KVM-RT Host, with Hardware Gen 1 retired, Gen 2 in production, and Gen 3 planned refresh.

    Preserving Legacy Real-Time Applications Through Virtualization

    Preserving Legacy Real-Time Applications Through Virtualization Real-time applications often remain in service much longer than the hardware on which they were originally developed. Test systems, industrial controls, simulation environments, and data-acquisition platforms…

    Read more

  • Diagram comparing native RedHawk Linux (left) and RedHawk KVM-RT virtualization (right) with application layer and real-time workload on both sides.

    Native Real-Time Linux vs. Real-Time Virtualization: Which Architecture Fits Your Application?

    Native Real-Time Linux vs. Real-Time Virtualization: Which Architecture Fits Your Application? Virtualization is now common in enterprise computing, but timing-sensitive systems introduce requirements that conventional IT workloads do not share. An application may…

    Read more

  • Diagram of NUMA placement: keep Cores, Memory, and PCIe device in one node (local placement). Cross-node placement is discouraged (Node 0 and Node 1).

    How CPU Shielding, NUMA, and Interrupt Affinity Affect Real-Time Virtual Machines

    How CPU Shielding, NUMA, and Interrupt Affinity Affect Real-Time Virtual Machines Running a real-time operating system inside a virtual machine does not automatically create a deterministic environment. The virtual machine still depends…

    Read more